Similar to all forms of food production, aquaculture has its pros and cons. Some of these pros include decreasing the pressure on wild fish populations and allowing for a more controlled environment to meet the demands of consumers. However, aquaculture's vices can be almost equally as environmentally damaging as its counterparts; such as run off produces from nutrient-enriched waters caused by fish feed and feces, and the use of other organism's habitats to raise the fish, whether it be a artificially constructed farm or a regulated area of a natural body of water.
A scientific report conducted by Environment Tasmania found major gaps in Tassal's environmental monitoring, ultimately calling for urgent research on the direct that the company has on the surrounding waters, which are visibly murkier since the start of this company.
So ultimately this issue leaves us with several important questions:
How do we meet a growing demand for fish?
To what extent must the environment suffer at the expense of human need?
Are salmon the friendliest fish to farm, or environmental fiends. Stay tuned...
Author: Alicia Menendez
Sources: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-09-30/controversial-plans-to-expand-tasmanian-farmed-salmon-industry/5780140
Extra: Video on Australian Salmon farms: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-09-30/are-salmon-farms-damaging-australian-waters/5780642
I wrote a paper last spring on genetically modified salmon. Like many GMO crops, they're getting a horrible rap in the press but it seems like they could help a lot by growing more efficiently and making Salmon farming more economically feasible, reducing pressure on natural fisheries.
ReplyDeleteIf you're curious, happy to discuss more. There's a lot of pros to fish farming, especially as compared to the status quo of big ocean trawlers :)