Encouraging
tourism through World Heritage Sites is like planting kudzu and Miracle Grow in
your backyard herb garden: it’s a sure path to smothering the “good stuff.”
Just as the kudzu vine will effortlessly suffocate your most robust basil or
thyme sprouts, heavy tourism through fragile ecosystems can reduce natural
oases to wastelands. This lucrative business is called ecotourism, and it besmirches
natural ecosystems by cheering on clumsy tourists as they tromp brazenly
through delicate environments. Tourists are notorious. Tourists abide by their
own rules. Tourists do things like wander off designated paths, feed bears
Nutter Butters, and then chuck that Nutter Butter wrapper into a pond, where it
might eventually asphyxiate an endangered fish—destructive things.
Or so
they say.
A new
draft management plan for the Tasmanian Wilderness World
Heritage Area would argue otherwise. The plan includes huge development
opportunities for the Tasmanian sustainable tourism industry, which would,
according to TWWHA, not only turn a profit that could be used to foster
environmental protection, but also educate its visitors on the importance of
environmental preservation, and perhaps create a generation of conservationists
in doing so. The TWWHA believes this vision can be attained by the practice of
“interpretation,” in which specialized guides educate visitors on the natural
and cultural resources surrounding them. Preliminary research by R.B.
Powell and S.H. Ham published in the Journal of Sustainable Tourism has found
that the practice of interpretation significantly encouraged pro-environmental
attitudes and intentions to support conservation. The TWWHA has called upon
this research to support its new draft management plan, which calls for
increased ecotourism through Tasmania’s World Heritage Sites. To play
[Tasmanian] devil’s advocate, it’s easy to call a bluff on this research.
First, it’s sponsored by the Journal of Sustainable Tourism (read: bias). Next,
the follow-up actions of the
participants were never measured—and isn’t that what truly matters in
protecting Tasmania’s forests? Not the actions we say we will take, but the actions we actually do take.
I’ll admit that I am a bit skeptical of the idea
that bolstering ecotourism is the world’s answer to protecting the last
untouched areas of our earth. However, that’s not to say I don’t think it can
help. When integrated into a larger plan of action—one that includes conservation legislation, the
management and protection of sanctuaries, and the enforcement of restricted
areas—sustainable tourism just may be the path to Paradise Gained.
Source: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/state-politics/wilderness-lost-as-tasmania-opens-world-heritage-area-for-new-growth/story-e6frgczx-1227185171221?nk=bf3e4e7d8adbcf3d97ad80319f2ec4f7
Source: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/state-politics/wilderness-lost-as-tasmania-opens-world-heritage-area-for-new-growth/story-e6frgczx-1227185171221?nk=bf3e4e7d8adbcf3d97ad80319f2ec4f7
-Jory Huelskamp
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI think ecotourism definitely CAN help both with education and raising money for conservation: the question here is whether the current plans involve some tourism industry profits going towards conservation, or whether that's just wishful thinking / propaganda. I also read somewhere that the new World Heritage Site regulations will allow logging, which feels like way more of a stretch. - Aaron
ReplyDelete